Improving the accuracy of GIPAW chemical shielding calculations with cluster and fragment corrections
Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, ISSN: 0926-2040, Vol: 122, Page: 101832
2022
- 11Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef8
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Ab initio methods for predicting NMR parameters in the solid state are an essential tool for assigning experimental spectra and play an increasingly important role in structural characterizations. Recently, a molecular correction (MC) technique has been developed which combines the strengths of plane-wave methods (GIPAW) with single molecule calculations employing Gaussian basis sets. The GIPAW + MC method relies on a periodic calculation performed at a lower level of theory to model the crystalline environment. The GIPAW result is then corrected using a single molecule calculation performed at a higher level of theory. The success of the GIPAW + MC method in predicting a range of NMR parameters is a result of the highly local character of the tensors underlying the NMR observable. However, in applications involving strong intermolecular interactions we find that expanding the region treated at the higher level of theory more accurately captures local many-body contributions to the N15 NMR chemical shielding (CS) tensor. We propose alternative corrections to GIPAW which capture interactions between adjacent molecules at a higher level of theory using either fragment or cluster-based calculations. Benchmark calculations performed on N15 and C13 data sets show that these advanced GIPAW-corrected calculations improve the accuracy of chemical shielding tensor predictions relative to existing methods. Specifically, cluster-based N15 corrections show a 24% and 17% reduction in RMS error relative to GIPAW and GIPAW + MC calculations, respectively. Comparing the benchmark data sets using multiple computational models demonstrates that N15 CS tensor calculations are significantly more sensitive to intermolecular interactions relative to C13. However, fragment and cluster-based corrections that include direct hydrogen bond partners are sufficient for optimizing the accuracy of GIPAW-corrected methods. Finally, GIPAW-corrected methods are applied to the particularly challenging NMR spectral assignment of guanosine dihydrate which contains two guanosine molecules in the asymmetric unit.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926204022000613; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssnmr.2022.101832; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85139082364&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36198253; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0926204022000613; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssnmr.2022.101832
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know