Controlled release urea improved crop yields and mitigated nitrate leaching under cotton-garlic intercropping system in a 4-year field trial
Soil and Tillage Research, ISSN: 0167-1987, Vol: 175, Page: 158-167
2018
- 90Citations
- 64Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Nitrogen fertilization is important for improving crop yields, but excessive amounts lead to high N losses through nitrate (NO 3 − -N) leaching. Controlled-release urea (CRU) has been shown to increase crop yields, yet the long term effects of CRU on soil NO 3 − -N distribution are not well known. A 4-year field experiment applied 50% (100 kg ha −1 ), 100% (200 kg ha −1 ) and 150% (300 kg ha −1 ) of the local practice N rates with CRU and urea was conducted under cotton-garlic intercropping system in Shandong Province, China. The linear increase in garlic yield and curvilinear increase in cotton yield indicates that crop yields increased as the input N rate increased with both urea and CRU while exceeded N application decreased cotton yields. The successive release of N from CRU permitted the meeting of the full N requirements of crops grown. Consequently, the lint cotton yield of CRU treatments was increased by 5.2%-17.3%, and garlic bulb yield increased by 2.0%-7.4%, compared with urea treatment. Although the CRU100% supplied one-third less N than Urea150%, the CRU100% produced −0.6%-5.6% more cotton, and −4.0%-2.6% more garlic than Urea150%. The NO 3 − -N contents of CRU treatments were augmented in 0–40 cm soil, but the opposite trend was found in 60–100 cm soil. The organic matter and total N contents in 0–40 cm profile were increased with CRU fertilization over 4-year fertilization. However, no prominent difference of available P and K contents in 0–20 cm soil was observed between CRU and urea treatments. Thus a one-third decrease in the recommended N application rate of urea is possible with CRU while maintaining crops yield, decreasing NO 3 − -N leaching to deep soil layer and preserving the soil fertility in North China plain.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198717301551; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.08.015; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029706001&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167198717301551; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167198717301551?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167198717301551?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.08.015
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know