Molecular insights into the initiation step of the Rcs signaling pathway
Structure, ISSN: 0969-2126, Vol: 32, Issue: 9, Page: 1381-1393.e4
2024
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
The Rcs pathway is repressed by the inner membrane protein IgaA under non-stressed conditions. This repression is hypothesized to be relieved by the binding of the outer membrane-anchored RcsF to IgaA. However, the precise mechanism by which RcsF binding triggers the signaling remains unclear. Here, we present the 1.8 Å resolution crystal structure capturing the interaction between IgaA and RcsF. Our comparative structural analysis, examining both the bound and unbound states of the periplasmic domain of IgaA (IgaAp), highlights rotational flexibility within IgaAp. Conversely, the conformation of RcsF remains unchanged upon binding. Our in vivo and in vitro studies do not support the model of a stable complex involving RcsF, IgaAp, and RcsDp. Instead, we demonstrate that the elements beyond IgaAp play a role in the interaction between IgaA and RcsD. These findings collectively allow us to propose a potential mechanism for the signaling across the inner membrane through IgaA.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969212624002211; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.06.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85198589681&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38964336; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0969212624002211
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know