Reusing waste plastic bottle to reduce MoO 3 into carbon-supported MoO 2 nanoparticles for efficient water electrolysis
Surfaces and Interfaces, ISSN: 2468-0230, Vol: 42, Page: 103297
2023
- 6Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
One of the efficient ways to produce hydrogen through electrolysis of water is oxygen evolution reaction (OER). OER being an anodic process requires highly efficient, sustainable and economic electrocatalysts with long term stability. In this work, plastic water bottle is utilized as a carbon source and a reducing agent to reduce MoO 3 to carbon supported MoO 2 (MoO 2 @C) as an efficient electrocatalyst for OER. The conductive carbon layers encapsulating the MoO 2 nanoparticles enhances the charge transfer rate and improves the long-term stability. The defect rich supporting carbon exhibits high specific surface area and improves the electrochemical activity of MoO 2 nanoparticles. The sample requires only an overpotential of 516 mV (vs. Ag/AgCl) to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm-2 and a low Tafel slope of 84.4 mV dec −1. It displays excellent electrochemical stability up to 2000 cyclic voltammetry (CV) cycles and revealed excellent stability up to 24 h. The reported method provides an efficient way to reuse waste plastic bottle to as carbon source as well as reducing agent produce MoO 2 @C electrocatalyst at an industrial scale.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468023023006673; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2023.103297; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85169425053&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468023023006673; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2023.103297
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know