Trends in adherence to NCCN guidelines for breast conserving therapy in women with Stage I and II breast cancer: Analysis of the 1998–2008 National Cancer Data Base
Surgical Oncology, ISSN: 0960-7404, Vol: 26, Issue: 4, Page: 359-367
2017
- 11Citations
- 40Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes10
- CrossRef10
- 10
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures40
- Readers40
- 40
Article Description
To examine temporal trends in guideline adherence for breast cancer local therapy, by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic and insurance status. Treatment guidelines recommend breast conserving therapy (BCT) for women with small cancers, but have been unevenly applied. A better understanding of time-trends in guideline adherence may point to interventions for correction. Patients with tumors ≤2 cm (n = 1,081,075) were identified from 1123 NCDB hospitals, dividing the interval 1998–2011 into 5 segments. Significant differences in rates of guideline adherence over time for race/ethnicity, quartiles of income, education, and insurance status were identified using Chi-square tests. Random effects logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) for the likelihood of guideline adherence controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hospital type and region. Multivariate models revealed disparities in use of BCT for women ≤39 years (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.48–0.50); for Asians (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.65–0.69); for women in the lowest education quartile (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.87–0.91); and for women in rural regions, (OR 0.79 95% CI 0.76–0.81). The largest radiotherapy disparity was for the oldest women (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.37–0.38), and in rural regions OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.63–0.71. Over time, differences persisted in BCT use (for race, income, education, insurance type); and for endocrine therapy (by race and education). There was mixed progress in reducing disparities in guideline adherence. These results are conservative, since the most favorable tumor stages were analyzed in the NCDB, which reflects higher quality of care than non-participating hospitals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740417302335; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2017.07.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026773198&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29113653; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960740417302335; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2017.07.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know