A collaborative optimization algorithm for energy-efficient multi-objective distributed no-idle flow-shop scheduling
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, ISSN: 2210-6502, Vol: 50, Page: 100557
2019
- 111Citations
- 85Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Facing the energy crisis, manufacturers is paying much attention to the energy-efficient scheduling by taking both economic benefits and energy conservation into account. Meanwhile, with the economic globalization, it is significant to facilitate the advanced manufacturing and scheduling in the distributed way. This paper addresses the energy-efficient distributed no-idle permutation flow-shop scheduling problem (EEDNIPFSP) to minimize makespan and total energy consumption simultaneously. By analyzing the characteristics of the problem, several properties are derived. To solve the problem effectively, a collaborative optimization algorithm (COA) is proposed by using the properties and some collaborative mechanisms. First, two heuristics are collaboratively utilized for population initialization to guarantee certain quality and diversity. Second, multiple search operators collaborate in a competitive way to enhance the exploration adaptively. Third, different local intensification strategies are designed for the dominated and non-dominated individuals to enhance the exploitation. Fourth, a speed adjusting strategy for the non-critical operations is designed to improve total energy consumption. The effect of key parameters is investigated using the design-of-experiment with full factorial setting. Comparisons based on extensive numerical tests are carried out, which demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in solving the EEDNIPFSP.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210650219302652; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100557; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069718865&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2210650219302652; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100557
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know