Push and pull search embedded in an M2M framework for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, ISSN: 2210-6502, Vol: 54, Page: 100651
2020
- 59Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In dealing with constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs), a key issue of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) is to balance the convergence and diversity of working populations. However, most state-of-the-art MOEAs show poor performance in balancing them, and can cause the working populations to concentrate on part of the Pareto fronts, leading to serious imbalanced searching between preserving diversity and achieving convergence. This paper proposes a method which combines a multi-objective to multi-objective (M2M) decomposition approach with the push and pull search (PPS) framework, namely PPS-M2M. To be more specific, the proposed algorithm decomposes a CMOP into a set of simple CMOPs. Each simple CMOP corresponds to a sub-population and is solved in a collaborative manner. When dealing with constraints, each sub-population follows a procedure of “ignore the constraints in the push stage and consider the constraints in the pull stage”, which helps each working sub-population get across infeasible regions. In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed PPS-M2M, it is compared with the other nine algorithms, including CM2M, MOEA/D-Epsilon, MOEA/D-SR, MOEA/D-CDP, C-MOEA/D, NSGA-II-CDP, MODE-ECHM, CM2M2 and MODE-SaE on a set of benchmark CMOPs. The experimental results show that the proposed PPS-M2M is significantly better than the other nine algorithms. In addition, a set of constrained and imbalanced multi-objective optimization problems (CIMOPs) are suggested to compare PPS-M2M and PPS-MOEA/D. The experimental results show that the proposed PPS-M2M outperforms PPS-MOEA/D on CIMOPs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210650218310629; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100651; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078992024&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2210650218310629; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100651
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know