Big data analytics for clinical decision-making: Understanding health sector perceptions of policy and practice
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, ISSN: 0040-1625, Vol: 174, Page: 121222
2022
- 22Citations
- 144Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The introduction and use of ‘big data and analytics’ is an on-going issue of discussion in health sectors globally. Healthcare systems of developed countries are trying to create more value and better healthcare through data and use of big data technologies. With an increasing number of articles identifying the value creation of big data and analytics for clinical decision-making, this paper examines how big data is applied, or not applied, in clinical practice. Using social representation theory as a theoretical foundation the paper explores people's perceptions of big data across all levels (policy making, planning, funding, and clinical care) of the New Zealand healthcare sector. The findings show that although adoption of big data technologies is planned for population health and health management, the potential of big data for clinical care has yet to be explored in the New Zealand context. The findings also highlight concern over data quality. The paper provides recommendations for policy and practice particularly around the need for engagement and participation of all levels to discuss data quality as well as big-data-based changes such as precision medicine and technology-assisted clinical decision-making tools. Future avenues of research are suggested.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521006557; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121222; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85115354725&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040162521006557; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121222
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know