Technological perspectives of Metaverse for financial service providers
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, ISSN: 0040-1625, Vol: 202, Page: 123323
2024
- 15Citations
- 157Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
Advice for financial institutions to remain competitive in the metaverse
Automation is making traditional financial service models obsolete. In the short term, financial institutions will need to ensure seamless transitions between the physical and virtual worlds and across metaverse platforms. In the future, users will conduct all their essential activities, such as studying, working and socialising in virtual reality. Ahmet Faruk Aysan, Giray Gozgor and Zhamal Nanaev
Article Description
Most banking institutions are inadequately prepared for the ongoing integration of technology, including the digitalization of financial services, the advent of the Metaverse, and the emergence of Web 3.0. While other sectors are making strides in navigating virtual environments, financial institutions appear to be trailing. Concurrently, the nascent ecosystem of the Metaverse presents promising opportunities for businesses and industries, potentially revolutionizing economic models, governance frameworks, and ethical paradigms. This study aims to contribute to the emerging discourse on the provision of financial services within the Metaverse. The paper envisages virtual reality's future financial services landscape using a scenario-based technological foresight approach. This research is the first attempt to map the comprehensive landscape of financial services in the Metaverse, both in the present context and the foreseeable future. The paper delineates the economy of the Metaverse, its key sectors, and its enablers. It overviews the initial experiences with virtual financial services and proposes potential prospects for financial institutions operating within the Metaverse. This study, therefore, serves as a foundational reference for understanding the evolving dynamics of financial services in the virtual realm.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524001197; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123323; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188507667&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040162524001197; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123323
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know