U–Pb zircon ages and geochemistry of Kangareh and Taghiabad mafic bodies in northern Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, Iran: Evidence for intra-oceanic arc and back-arc tectonic regime in Late Jurassic
Tectonophysics, ISSN: 0040-1951, Vol: 660, Page: 47-64
2015
- 58Citations
- 49Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The northern Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone (SaSZ) in northwestern Iran contains several granitoid and gabbroic bodies that are parallel to the Zagros Suture zone in a northwest–southeast direction. The fine-grained Taghiabad gabbro and coarse-grained Kangareh gabbroic bodies southwest of the Ghorveh in the northern SaSZ were crystallized at 158.0 ± 10.0 Ma and 148.3 ± 3.6 Ma, respectively, based on U–Pb zircon dating. The SiO 2 contents of the Kangareh and Taghiabad rocks are similar and range from 45.5 to 51.5 wt.%, and the Al 2 O 3 contents vary from 14 to 24 wt.%, with high Mg number (Mg# = 61–72% and 46–63%, respectively). The Taghiabad body has higher contents of TiO 2, Fe 2 O 3, and P 2 O 5 than the Kangareh rocks. The Fe 2 O 3 contents of the Taghiabad rocks vary from 6 to 15 wt.%, whereas those of the Kangareh rocks range from 5 to 9 wt.%. The TiO 2 concentrations of the Taghiabad samples are high (1–3 wt.%), and these rocks can be classified as high Ti and Fe rocks. The chemical compositions of the two bodies show some clear differences. Positive εNd(t) values (+ 3 to + 8) and low initial 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios (0.7034 to 0.7054) indicate a depleted mantle source for both bodies. The variation and distribution of trace elements, REEs patterns, and initial 87 Sr/ 86 Sr– 143 Nd/ 144 Nd ratios show that the Kangareh and Taghiabad bodies have high affinities to tholeiitic and alkaline magmatic series. These results suggest an arc and back-arc system regime in an intra-oceanic system than the Andean magmatic type regime for the origin of these bodies in the Middle to Late Jurassic period. These complexes merged with the northern SaSZ during accretion-type continental growth in the Late Jurassic.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195115004357; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.08.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84947046971&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040195115004357; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.08.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know