Isolation and transplantation of spermatogonia in sheep
Theriogenology, ISSN: 0093-691X, Vol: 66, Issue: 9, Page: 2091-2103
2006
- 103Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations103
- Citation Indexes103
- 103
- CrossRef68
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Studies in rodents show that spermatogonial transplantation is an excellent new tool for studying spermatogenesis and for preservation and dissemination of genetics. The aim of this study was to adapt the technique to rams. Two issues were addressed: purification of stem cell spermatogonia, and efficient injection of donor spermatogonia into the seminiferous tubules of rams. We compared differential plating and Percoll gradient methods for purifying donor spermatogonia from ram lamb testes. Spermatogonia were identified with an antibody against PGP 9.5, a ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase. Both purity and total number of spermatogonia recovered were higher after purification by Percoll gradient than by differential plating. Four approaches for injecting cells into the seminiferous tubules of ram testes were compared ex vivo: insertion of a needle into the extra-testicular rete testis after reflection of the head of the epididymis (‘surgical’ approach), and ultrasound-guided insertion of a needle into the extra-testicular rete, and the proximal and distal parts of the intra-testicular rete testis. ‘Surgical’ and ultrasound-guided approaches into the extra-testicular rete resulted in highest success rates and best filling of the seminiferous tubules. Finally, the ultrasound guided approach into the extra-testicular rete testis was validated in vivo by transplanting purified spermatogonia previously labeled with a fluorescent molecule (CFDA-SE). In seven of eight testes injected, donor cells were identified within the seminiferous epithelium for up to 2 wk after transplantation, indicating the integration of donor cells.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X06003542; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.03.039; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33846005105&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870245; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093691X06003542; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.03.039
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know