Mimicking dynamic in vivo environments with stimuli-responsive materials for cell culture
Trends in Biotechnology, ISSN: 0167-7799, Vol: 30, Issue: 8, Page: 426-439
2012
- 99Citations
- 176Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations99
- Citation Indexes99
- 99
- CrossRef83
- Captures176
- Readers176
- 176
Review Description
Traditional synthetic substrates and matrices for cell culture have proven to be of only limited utility in efforts to understand and control cell behavior, in large part because they fail to capture the multifarious biochemical, mechanical, geometric and dynamic characteristics of in vivo environments. However, recent advances in materials chemistry and engineering have begun to provide researchers with a toolbox to mimic the complex characteristics of natural extracellular matrices (ECMs), providing new pathways to explore cell–matrix interactions and direct cell fate under physiologically realistic conditions. In this review, we describe recent developments in stimuli-responsive materials as dynamic substrates and matrices for cell culture, and highlight their use in furthering our understanding of how cells respond to temporal variations in their environment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167779912000546; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.04.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84863873221&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22658474; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167779912000546; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.04.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know