Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development
Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, ISSN: 0165-6147, Vol: 44, Issue: 3, Page: 175-189
2023
- 71Citations
- 264Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations71
- Citation Indexes71
- 71
- CrossRef29
- Captures264
- Readers264
- 264
Review Description
Due to their high target specificity and binding affinity, therapeutic antibodies are currently the largest class of biotherapeutics. The traditional largely empirical antibody development process is, while mature and robust, cumbersome and has significant limitations. Substantial recent advances in computational and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are now starting to overcome many of these limitations and are increasingly integrated into development pipelines. Here, we provide an overview of AI methods relevant for antibody development, including databases, computational predictors of antibody properties and structure, and computational antibody design methods with an emphasis on machine learning (ML) models, and the design of complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops, antibody structural components critical for binding.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165614722002796; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2022.12.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147605448&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36669976; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165614722002796; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2022.12.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know