Identification of pre- and pro-haptens with a β-galactosidase-expressing E. coli culture system for skin sensitization
Toxicology Letters, ISSN: 0378-4274, Vol: 305, Page: 81-93
2019
- 2Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Although several in vitro approaches were successful in separating chemicals as skin sensitizers and non-sensitizers, none of the available methods completely mimics the absolute in vivo scenario of skin sensitization. One of the major challenges with currently available systems would be the limited or no metabolic capacity to activate pre- or pro-haptens to reactive metabolites in the system. In the present study, E. coli cells with β-galactosidase-expressing LacZ gene were combined with either induced rat liver S-9 fractions or microsomal fractions to detect pre- or pro-haptens to cause skin sensitization. Following optimization of some experimental conditions, we examined 20 sensitizers classified as pre- or pro-haptens and 11 non-sensitizers in these E. coli cultures by incubating bacterial cells and test chemicals with and without S-9 or microsomal proteins. After a 6-h incubation in the presence of IPTG, cells were lyzed to determine the suppression of β-galactosidase enzyme. A cut-off of 17.3% was applied to determine the percent suppression of β-galactosidase activity by test chemicals to classify skin sensitizers and non-sensitizers. Among chemicals tested, 19 pre- or pro-haptens were categorized as true positives and 8 non-sensitizers were categorized as true negatives. Thereby, the overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy achieved with microsome-incorporated and S-9 fraction-incorporated group were 95.0%, 72.7% and 87.1% and 80.0%, 81.8% and 80.6%, respectively. The results suggested that the present bacterial system incorporated with the microsomal activation system could be considered as a useful alternative method to classify not only direct-acting sensitizers but also pre- or pro-haptens requiring metabolic activation in vitro.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427419300219; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.01.015; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061175472&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30711672; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378427419300219; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.01.015
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know