Developing a screening test for toxicity studies of prenatal development with the use of Hydra attenuata and embryos of zebrafish
Toxicology Reports, ISSN: 2214-7500, Vol: 8, Page: 1742-1753
2021
- 3Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
11 active substances used in pesticides were selected. Substances were divided into three groups depending the effect on embryos or fetuses of laboratory animals: 1 – damaging effect on embryos or fetuses (embryotoxic, fetotoxic or teratogenic), 2 – damaging effect on embryos or fetuses, but only at dose toxic for mother (maternal toxicity), 3 – no damaging effect. Changes for hydra in acute toxicity tests and recovery tests were assessed on an change scale from 0 to 10. The index of the effect on development (TI) for hydras was calculated for every compound. Changes in zebrafish embryos were assessed using a descriptive method. Pearson correlation coefficient showed the correlation between the concentration and the toxic effect in the zebrafish embryos for the substances of the first group. The study showed that substances having a strong damaging effect on fetuses cause changes that are apparent and easy to evaluate both in hydras and zebrafish embryos. A scoring system was introduced to evaluate the changes of hydras and zebrafish embryos. The point system of evaluation of changes allows quick classification of a substance as potentially embryotoxic, fetotoxic or teratogenic. It allows developing a cheap and fast method alternative to prenatal developmental toxicity studies, a screening method that enables substances of great teratogenic potential to be excluded from studies on laboratory animals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001712; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.09.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116636654&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660207; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214750021001712; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.09.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know