Novel prognostic model established for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma based on pyroptosis-related genes
Translational Oncology, ISSN: 1936-5233, Vol: 14, Issue: 12, Page: 101233
2021
- 24Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
We aimed at establishing a risk – score model using pyroptosis-related genes to predict the prognosis of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). A total of 33 pyroptosis-related genes were selected. We then evaluated the data of 502 HNSCC patients and 44 normal patients from TCGA database. Gene expression was then profiled to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Using the univariate, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analyses, we generated a risk – score model. Tissue samples from neoplastic and normal sites of 44 HNSCC patients were collected. qRT-PCR were employed to analyze the mRNA level of the samples. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the overall survival rate (OS). Enrichment analysis was performed to elucidate the underlying mechanism of HNSCC patient's differentially survival status from the perspective of tumor immunology. 17 genes were categorized as DEGs. GSDME, IL-6, CASP8, CASP6, NLRP1 and NLRP6 were used to establish the risk – score model. Each patient's risk score in the TCGA cohort was calculated using the risk – score formula. The risk score was able to independently predict the OS of the HNSCC patients ( P = 0.02). The OS analysis showed that the risk score model ( P < 0.0001) was more reliable than single gene, a phenomenon verified by practical patient cohort. Additionally, enrichment analysis indicated more active immune activities in low-risk group than high-risk group. In conclusion, our risk – score model has provided novel strategy for the prediction of HNSCC patients’ prognosis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523321002254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101233; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85115953522&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34600420; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1936523321002254; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101233
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know