Advancing Systematic Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, ISSN: 0169-5347, Vol: 35, Issue: 12, Page: 1129-1139
2020
- 58Citations
- 162Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations58
- Citation Indexes58
- 58
- CrossRef52
- Captures162
- Readers162
- 162
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Better conservation planning can improve human life too
Conservation planning can be greatly improved to benefit human communities, while still protecting biodiversity, according to University of Queensland research.
Review Description
Conservation and sustainable management activities are critical for enhancing ecosystem services. Systematic conservation planning (SCP) is a spatial decision support process used to identify the most cost-effective places for intervention and is increasingly incorporating ecosystem services thinking. Yet, there is no clear guidance on how to incorporate ecosystem service components (i.e., supply, demand, and flow) for multiple beneficiaries into the decision problem underpinning SCP. As such, conservation plans may fall short of maximizing benefits for both people and nature. We propose a benefit-based approach to integrate ecosystem service components into SCP that uses the principles of decision theory. Our approach will improve the likelihood that ecosystem service benefits are enhanced in spatial planning applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534720302317; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.08.016; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096456974&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32977982; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169534720302317; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.08.016
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know