De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies reduce graft survival rates and increase the risk of kidney transplant rejection: A single-center retrospective study
Transplant Immunology, ISSN: 0966-3274, Vol: 68, Page: 101430
2021
- 7Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef3
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
We investigated the impact of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (dnDSAs) on long-term death-censored graft survival and renal allograft rejection in kidney transplant recipients. The sample for this retrospective cohort study comprised 121 recipients of kidney transplants with negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches to their deceased donors. Recipients were divided into two groups: dnDSAs+ ( n = 31) and dnDSAs- ( n = 90). We evaluated rejection and long-term graft survival rates in the recipients along with pathologic changes in the transplanted kidneys. DnDSAs were identified in 31/121 patients (25.6%). The graft survival rate in the dnDSAs+ group was 87.1% (27/31) and that of the dnDSAs- group was 97.8% (88/90). The dnDSAs+ group had lower graft survival rates than patients without dnDSAs ( p = 0.007). There was no difference in the graft survival rates between patients with high DSA mean fluorescence intensity (≥4000) and those with low intensity (<4000) ( p = 0.669). There was also no difference in the graft survival rates of patients with HLA class I, II, and I + II dnDSAs ( p = 0.571). The presence of dnDSA in serum was associated with a higher incidence of antibody- and T-cell–mediated rejection ( p < 0.0001). Banff scores for arterial fibrointimal and arteriolar hyalin, thickening as well as C4d deposition differed for the dnDSAs+ and dnDSAs- groups ( p < 0.05). DnDSAs were found to be associated with decreased long-term graft survival rates and increased rejection rates, often accompanied by C4d deposition.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966327421000708; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trim.2021.101430; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109096500&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34147608; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0966327421000708; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trim.2021.101430
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know