PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Researching cycling innovations: The contested nature of understanding and shaping smart cycling futures

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ISSN: 2590-1982, Vol: 8, Page: 100247
2020
  • 21
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 101
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 1
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    21
    • Citation Indexes
      12
    • Policy Citations
      9
      • Policy Citation
        9
  • Captures
    101
  • Social Media
    1
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      1
      • Facebook
        1

Article Description

With this commentary, we share our reflections at the end of a five-year interdisciplinary research project (from 2016 to 2020) on cycling innovations in living labs across the Netherlands. The commentary is the product of a collective writing effort of the researchers. It combines reflections on both the content of our research project (cycling through the lens of innovations) from various disciplinary perspectives – including socio-technical transitions, mobilities, urban design, transport planning and history – and reflections on the transdisciplinary approach (living labs) underpinning our research. We hope that our reflections can benefit other researchers concerned with similar topics and approaches. Our research project, Smart Cycling Futures (SCF), began as a proposal within the Smart Urban Regions of the Future (SURF) program, funded by the Dutch Council for Academic Research (NWO). This call of €16.5 million was co-financed by the Dutch Ministries of Infrastructure & Environment and Internal Affairs. As one of the five winning consortia – the other consortia focused on self-driving cars, influencing travel behaviour, demand-oriented public transport, and small-scale experiments – our group of mobility-oriented researchers played an active role in shaping the evolving landscape of smart mobility innovation in the Netherlands.

Bibliographic Details

Marco te Brömmelstroet; Anna Nikolaeva; Samuel Nello-Deakin; Arnoud van Waes; Jacco Farla; Marcus Popkema; Pieter van Wesemael; George Liu; Rob Raven; Friso de Vor; Matthew Bruno

Elsevier BV

Engineering; Social Sciences; Decision Sciences

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know