Leveraging divergent thinking to enhance the academic performance of engineering students with executive functioning difficulties
Thinking Skills and Creativity, ISSN: 1871-1871, Vol: 45, Page: 101109
2022
- 5Citations
- 56Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Executive functioning (EF) is a set of high-level cognitive skills, including planning, organizing, prioritizing, logical and contextual thinking, understanding, working memory, and self-monitoring. Though these skills are critical for academic success across fields, engineering education may be especially demanding for those with poor EF. One potential resource that may help to buffer against the negative effects of poor EF on academic achievement is divergent thinking. This study examined the role of divergent thinking as a moderating variable in the relationship between EF and academic achievement in engineering education. Undergraduate engineering students completed a self-report scale of EF and tests assessing figural and verbal divergent thinking, across multiple study sessions. Participants’ GPA was obtained from the university registrar's office. Participant data ( N = 199) were analyzed using correlational analysis and a multiple moderation model. Results showed that EF scores and engineering GPA were significantly negatively correlated, and that figural (yet not verbal) divergent thinking moderated the association. A greater frequency of behaviors reflecting problems with overall daily EF was associated with lower GPA for those with relatively lower figural divergent thinking ability. Thus, figural divergent thinking may be one personal resource that can be leveraged to enhance academic achievement in engineering students with poor EF.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187122001122; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101109; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147021392&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1871187122001122; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101109
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know