Comparison and analysis of Mueller-matrix spectra from exoskeletons of blue, green and red Cetonia aurata
Thin Solid Films, ISSN: 0040-6090, Vol: 571, Issue: P3, Page: 739-743
2014
- 15Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The exoskeleton, also called the cuticle, of specimens of the scarab beetle Cetonia aurata is a narrow-band reflector which exhibits metallic shine. Most specimens of C. aurata have a reflectance maximum in the green part of the spectrum but variations from blue–green to red–green are also found. A few specimens are also more distinct blue or red. Furthermore, the reflected light is highly polarized and at near-normal incidence near-circular left-handed polarization is observed. The polarization and color phenomena are caused by a nanostructure in the cuticle. This nanostructure can be modeled as a multilayered twisted biaxial layer from which reflection properties can be calculated. Specifically we calculate the cuticle Mueller matrix which then is fitted to Mueller matrices determined by dual-rotating compensator ellipsometry in the spectral range 400–800 nm at multiple angles of incidence. This non-linear regression analysis provides structural parameters like pitch of the chiral structure as well as layer refractive index data for the different layers in the cuticle. The objective here is to compare spectra measured on C. aurata with different colors and develop a generic structural model. Generally the degree of polarization is large in the spectral region corresponding to the color of the cuticle which for the blue specimen is 400–600 nm whereas for the red specimen it is 530–730 nm. In these spectral ranges, the Mueller-matrix element m 41 is non-zero and negative, in particular for small angles of incidence, implicating that the reflected light becomes near-circularly polarized with an ellipticity angle in the range 20°–45°.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040609014001461; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.012; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84920707211&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040609014001461; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0040609014001461?httpAccept=text/plain; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0040609014001461?httpAccept=text/xml; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.012
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know