Experimental study and resilience modeling for prefabricated hollow diaphragm walls of full-assembled underground stations under urban multi-disturbance conditions
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, ISSN: 0886-7798, Vol: 135, Page: 105044
2023
- 17Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A full-assembled underground station (FUS) using a prefabricated enclosure structure and prefabricated main structure was constructed for the first time in the Shenzhen Metro. The key technology of an FUS is the use of single-walled prefabricated diaphragm walls instead of traditional overlapping cast-in-situ diaphragm walls and exterior walls. To improve the applicability of a single-walled diaphragm wall for an FUS, this study proposed a novel prefabricated hollow diaphragm wall (PHDW) and investigated its response and resilience to urban multi-disturbance conditions. First, full-scale recoverability and ultimate bearing experiments were performed on the PHDWs. Second, a PHDW hierarchical resilience assessment framework was established. Third, a multi-disturbance finite element analysis (FEA) was performed on the Shenzhen Metro FUS using PHDWs. Based on above, a security management strategy was proposed. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The recoverability and ultimate bearing experiments revealed that the PHDW had both recoverability and ductility. (2) The FEA indicated significant variability in the multi-disturbance response of the PHDWs. Therefore, a rigid deformation control is inappropriate for the security management of PHDWs. (3) The disturbance deformation tolerance of a single-walled enclosure structure can be improved by approximately 20 %–60 % by using PHDW recoverability. (4) Multiple conditions of poor resilience must be fully alerted using a multi-disturbance monitoring strategy. This study provides a security management strategy for Shenzhen Metro FUS and facilitates the low-carbon construction of urban traffic facilities.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779823000640; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105044; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149873946&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0886779823000640; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105044
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know