Confinement-based direct design method for fibre reinforced polymer confined CFST short columns
Thin-Walled Structures, ISSN: 0263-8231, Vol: 192, Page: 111207
2023
- 13Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The paper presents a detailed analysis of the behaviour of circular and square concrete filled steel tube (CFST) short columns strengthened externally with carbon or glass fibre reinforced polymer sheets (CFRP or GFRP, respectively). A thorough review of existing test information is presented and discussed, and the most salient parameters in terms of the overall strength are identified. There are a large number of influential and inter-related parameters which affect the load-carrying capacity, including the geometry, cross-sectional shape, type of steel, concrete strength, boundary and loading conditions, and type of FRP. It is shown that existing design approaches do not reliably predict the strength for the full range of possible parameters. Therefore, this paper proposes a new design model to calculate the axial compressive strength of FRP-confined concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) short columns with either a circular or square cross-section. The method accounts for the various complexities which affect the behaviour, yet presents a user-friendly, performance-based design expression. It is based on an evaluation of the lateral confining pressure provided by the both the FRP and the steel tube to the concrete core. This is employed in the confinement-based direct resistance calculations. The paper validates the approach by comparing its capacity predictions with a large database of experimental results and alternative design models available in the literature. The results show that the proposed model provides much accurate strength predictions with greater reliability for the full range of parameters examined, than existing methods.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823123006857; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111207; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85171794632&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263823123006857; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111207
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know