Analysis on aeroelastic stability of rectangular-planed air-supported membrane structures
Thin-Walled Structures, ISSN: 0263-8231, Vol: 195, Page: 111416
2024
- 7Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This research investigates aeroelastic stability of rectangular-planed air-supported membrane structures subjected to wind actions. By employing potential theory to tackle air flows, the relations between extra aerodynamic forces and structural motions are resolved through the utilization of the boundary element method and the finite element method, capturing the complexities associated with structural geometries and wind pressure distributions. By combining these extra aerodynamic forces with structural dynamic equilibrium equations, critical instability wind velocities for various structural vibration modes are derived. The simulation results are validated through aeroelastic wind tunnel tests, demonstrating a close alignment between the numerical findings and experimental observations in terms of the critical wind velocity and the corresponding instability mode. Additionally, the study analyzes influences of structural geometric configurations, internal pressures, and membrane tensile stiffness on the critical instability wind velocities and corresponding instability modes. It is observed that lower aspect ratios, smaller structural spans, higher internal pressures, and greater membrane tensile stiffness can increase the critical instability wind velocity, corresponding to variations in critical instability mode shapes. Results obtained from this research are expected to provide guidance for the development of wind-resistant designs for air-supported membrane structures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823123008947; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111416; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85178155448&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263823123008947; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111416
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know