Prediction of air pollutants for air quality using deep learning methods in a metropolitan city
Urban Climate, ISSN: 2212-0955, Vol: 46, Page: 101291
2022
- 25Citations
- 46Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Air quality forecasting is very difficult in metropolitan areas due to emissions, high population density, and uncertainty in defining meteorological areas. The use of incomplete information during the training phase and the poor model selection to be used restrict the air quality estimation. In this study, predictions of PM10 and SO2 air pollutants in 2022 were made by using Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTM), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) by revising the error term of traditional methods and completing the missing data. The data of Basaksehir district of Istanbul province, where industrialization and population are very concentrated, were obtained from the national air quality monitoring network. When PM10 and SO2 estimation results obtained are compared with the real values, 15.15 real data belonging to PM10, is estimated as 15.11 in LSTM. Likewise, 4.65 real data belonging to SO2, is estimated as 5.18 in LSTM. As a result of the application, LSTM predicts PM10 and SO2 better than the MLP and RNN models. The results were compared with other studies in the literature, and the proposed LSTM deep learning architecture performed well compared to studies using data sets and location information under similar conditions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212095522002097; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101291; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85138798121&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212095522002097; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101291
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know