Histotripsy for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas: A Feasibility Study in Ex Vivo Uterine Fibroids
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, ISSN: 0301-5629, Vol: 48, Issue: 8, Page: 1652-1662
2022
- 12Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef6
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas), the most common benign tumors in women of reproductive age, are a frequent cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding and other reproductive complaints among women. This study investigates the feasibility of using histotripsy, a non-invasive, non-thermal focused ultrasound ablation method, to ablate uterine fibroids. Human fibroid samples (n = 16) were harvested after hysterectomy or myomectomy procedures at Carilion Memorial Hospital. Histotripsy was applied to ex vivo fibroids in two sets of experiments using a 700-kHz clinical transducer to apply multicycle histotripsy pulses and a prototype 500-kHz transducer to apply single-cycle histotripsy pulses. Ultrasound imaging was used for real-time treatment monitoring, and post-treatment ablation was quantified histologically using hematoxylin and eosin and Masson trichrome stains. Results revealed that multicycle histotripsy generated diffuse cavitation in targeted fibroids, with minimal cellular ablative changes after treatment with 2000 pulses/point. Single-cycle pulsing generated well-confined bubble clouds with evidence of early coagulative necrosis on histological assessment in samples treated with 2000 pulses/point, near-complete ablation in samples treated with 4000 pulses/point and complete tissue destruction in samples treated with 10,000 pulses/point. This study illustrates that histotripsy is capable of fibroid ablation under certain pulsing parameters and warrants further investigation as an improved non-invasive ablation method for the treatment of leiomyomas.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562922003623; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.04.214; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131076953&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641394; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301562922003623; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.04.214
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know