Comparison of open nephroureterectomy and ureteroscopic and percutaneous management of upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma
Urology, ISSN: 0090-4295, Vol: 67, Issue: 6, Page: 1181-1187
2006
- 115Citations
- 44Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations115
- Citation Indexes114
- CrossRef114
- 113
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures44
- Readers44
- 44
Article Description
To compare the outcomes in patients who had undergone either open nephroureterectomy or conservative endoscopic surgery (ureteroscopic or percutaneous management) for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. We performed a retrospective review of the data for patients treated surgically for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma from 1990 to 2004. The data included patient sex, age at diagnosis, mode of diagnosis, smoking history, history of bladder cancer, type of surgery, complications, and tumor site, size, stage, grade, recurrence, and progression. We also evaluated the recurrence and survival rates. Data were analyzed for 97 patients. The median patient age was 68 years. Sixteen patients had a history of bladder tumor. The surgical procedure was open nephroureterectomy in 54 patients, ureteroscopy in 27, and percutaneous endoscopic ablation in 16. The tumor stage, grade, and site were independent prognostic factors for survival in a multivariate analysis ( P <0.05). The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 81.9% for low-grade tumors and 47.3% for high-grade tumors ( P = 0.0001). A correlation ( P = 0.002) was found between low-grade tumors and superficial tumors. In patients with low-grade tumors (n = 46), the 5-year disease-specific survival rate after nephroureterectomy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous endoscopy was 84%, 80.7%, and 80%, respectively ( P = 0.89); the corresponding 5-year tumor-free survival rates were 75.3%, 71.5%, and 72% ( P = 0.78). Conservative surgery can be recommended as an alternative to nephroureterectomy for low-grade or superficial upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. For patients with high-grade or invasive tumors to be candidates for conservative surgery will require the development of additional prognostic factors (eg, molecular markers). These patients require long-term postoperative surveillance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429505017887; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.034; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33744801714&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16765178; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090429505017887; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.034
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know