Development and validation of patient-reported outcomes measures for overactive bladder: A review of concepts
Urology, ISSN: 0090-4295, Vol: 68, Issue: 2, Page: 9-16
2006
- 85Citations
- 48Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations85
- Citation Indexes85
- 85
- CrossRef76
- Captures48
- Readers48
- 48
Article Description
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are a valuable means for determining how a disease and its treatment affect patients, including effects on health-related quality of life (HRQL). To ensure that the results obtained with PROs are clinically useful, data must be gathered using valid and reliable instruments. Developing such instruments requires a multistep, structured process that incorporates cognitive psychology, psychometric theory, and patient and clinician input. The process begins by determining the intent and purpose of the PRO and culminates in studies that demonstrate the measure’s validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Several valid and reliable PROs are available for assessing the effects of treatment on symptom severity, symptom bother, and HRQL in patients with overactive bladder.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429506007709; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.042; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33746921274&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16908336; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090429506007709; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.042
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know