Including Medical Management in the Urologic Approach to Idiopathic Retroperitoneal Fibrosis
Urology, ISSN: 0090-4295, Vol: 152, Page: 167-172
2021
- 3Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
To characterize the timing and effectiveness of medical management in resolving stent-dependent ureteral compression secondary to idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF), the long-term relevant outcomes, and the side effects of treatment. A retrospective review of RPF patients diagnosed from 2002-2018 was performed. Patients with hydronephrosis due to ureteral involvement that were managed with medication and with temporary stenting as needed, but without initial ureterolysis, were included. Patient demographics and RPF management details were obtained, including the following subsequent events: ureterolysis, nephrectomy, recurrent upper tract obstruction, and medication side effects. Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Resolution of ureteral obstruction with medical management and temporary renal drainage as needed occurred in 36 (69%) patients with a median stent duration of 16 months, and median clinical and radiographic follow up of 4.2 and 3.3 years, respectively. Recurrent obstruction after a stent-free period occurred in 9 (18%) patients. Ureterolysis was performed in 8 (15%) patients at a median of 2.2 years for medication intolerance, lack of radiographic response to medication, or persisting pain. Potential medication side effects occurred in 6 (12%) patients. Medical management supported successful resolution of ureteral obstruction in 69% of patients without the need for ureterolysis after temporary renal drainage using stents, with rare incidence of worsening renal dysfunction or medication side effect. To date, this is the largest reported series of systematically managed RPF patients with obstructive uropathy receiving initial medical therapy and serves to counsel patients and advise urologists and nephrologists of the expected course and advantages and disadvantages of medical versus surgical management.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429521002533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104585311&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33716037; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090429521002533; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know