Long-term Follow-up of Patients With Cerebral Palsy Undergoing Catheterizable Channel Creation Without Concurrent Bladder Augmentation
Urology, ISSN: 0090-4295, Vol: 170, Page: 234-239
2022
- 2Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
To characterize long-term outcomes for adults with cerebral palsy who have undergone catheterizable channel creation without concurrent bladder augmentation. Retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent catheterizable channel creation without augmentation by the senior author. Variables of interest included development of de novo neurogenic detrusor overactivity, change in continence, escalation in therapy, and upper tract changes. Descriptive statistics were conducted using t-tests and chi-squared tests as appropriate. Nine patients were followed for an average of 70 months. Prior to surgery two patients were on regular clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), six were not on CIC, and one was on occasional CIC. Patients not on CIC preoperatively were more likely to develop de novo neurogenic detrusor overactivity (83% vs 0%, P = .02), and have statistically significant decreases in average compliance ( P = .04 vs P = .31). They were also more likely to require escalation in bladder therapy (83% vs 50%) and have worsening of incontinence (67% vs 0%), though these did not reach statistical significance ( P = .34, 0.1). Five patients underwent repeat urodynamics an average of 46 months after initial postoperative study because of persistent urgency - 4 of 5 had stable urodynamic findings and one demonstrated >50% reduction in compliance and capacity. Adults with cerebral palsy who are not on CIC prior to creation of a catheterizable channel are at high risk for development of de novo neurogenic detrusor overactivity and decrease in bladder compliance. Prophylactic augmentation should be considered in this group.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009042952200807X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.09.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141274713&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36170904; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S009042952200807X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.09.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know