Evaluating Decision Regret in Patients Who Have Undergone Sacral Neuromodulation
Urology, ISSN: 0090-4295, Vol: 197, Page: 63-68
2025
- 1Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Article Description
To quantify decision regret in individuals who had undergone sacral neuromodulation (SNM). Secondary objectives evaluated for correlation of subjects’ regret score with symptom relief, complications, device explant status, or military deployment status. Each subject’s decision regret was assessed via a telephone survey utilizing a validated decision regret tool, and regret scores were calculated. A score of 50 was utilized a cutoff, below which patients were deemed to have minimal regret while those scores above 50 were associated with significant decision regret. Comparative statistics were used to identify correlation between regret scores and patient outcomes and military deployment status. Out of 170 identified subjects, 96 completed the full survey. The mean age of study participants was 49.8 ± 14.5 years, and 58.3% of the participants were female. The average time from implant to survey was 64 months. The mean regret score for patients reporting symptom improvement with the device was 5.4 ± 9.2 (vs 44.1 ± 27.6 for those who did not report symptom improvement, P <.001). Regret scores for patients who had device complications were significantly higher than those who did not. At the time of the survey, 82.3% of subjects had the implant in place. Those subjects who underwent device explant had higher regret scores than those who retained their device. Decision regret related to SNM appeared low. SNM adverse outcome variables (poor symptom improvement, device complications, and explanted device) were associated with significantly higher decision regret scores than those with more ideal outcomes, but overall decision regret was still low. Military deployment had no correlation with SNM regret.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429524009543; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.067; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85209651117&origin=inward; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105001219736&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39486526; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090429524009543
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know