The role of lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, ISSN: 1078-1439, Vol: 22, Issue: 3, Page: 214-223
2004
- 43Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations43
- Citation Indexes42
- 42
- CrossRef41
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Review Description
After decades of evaluation, the role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma remains a controversy. Contemporary series suggest that the true incidence of isolated lymph node metastases in clinically localized disease is small, and the location of such metastases is unpredictable. While several institutional series have suggested a therapeutic benefit for extended lymphadenectomy, there remains a lack of randomized data to support its routine use. Despite this, there remains a role for lymphadenectomy in individuals with high risk of lymph node metastasis or known lymphadenopathy in whom few other options exist for aggressive, potentially curative therapy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143904001024; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2004.04.028; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=3242732241&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15271320; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1078143904001024; http://www.urologiconcology.org/article/S1078-1439(04)00102-4/abstract; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1078143904001024; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/getSharedSiteSession?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urologiconcology.org%2Farticle%2FS1078-1439%2804%2900102-4%2Fabstract&rc=0&code=uro-site; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.urologiconcology.org%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253DaaaQKczpa7Hpq99Wkf4xv%2526MAID%253D7vKDaWJF8nrj9ttV2sB31g%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLF%25252FdY29RpN4fA%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D199707315%2526RD%253DRD; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore/?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.urologiconcology.org%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253DaaaQKczpa7Hpq99Wkf4xv%2526MAID%253D7vKDaWJF8nrj9ttV2sB31g%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLF%25252FdY29RpN4fA%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D199707315%2526RD%253DRD; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/consumeSsoCookie?redirectUri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urologiconcology.org%2Faction%2FconsumeSharedSessionAction%3FJSESSIONID%3DaaaQKczpa7Hpq99Wkf4xv%26MAID%3D7vKDaWJF8nrj9ttV2sB31g%253D%253D%26SERVER%3DWZ6myaEXBLF%252FdY29RpN4fA%253D%253D%26ORIGIN%3D199707315%26RD%3DRD&acw=&utt=; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.urologiconcology.org%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaad2MK2fKCT-66LEWJxv%2526MAID%253D%25252FnWhlQmrMrjKWdqtdtA%25252Few%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLF%25252FdY29RpN4fA%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D158129490%2526RD%253DRD; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore/?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.urologiconcology.org%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaad2MK2fKCT-66LEWJxv%2526MAID%253D%25252FnWhlQmrMrjKWdqtdtA%25252Few%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLF%25252FdY29RpN4fA%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D158129490%2526RD%253DRD; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/consumeSsoCookie?redirectUri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urologiconcology.org%2Faction%2FconsumeSharedSessionAction%3FJSESSIONID%3Daaad2MK2fKCT-66LEWJxv%26MAID%3D%252FnWhlQmrMrjKWdqtdtA%252Few%253D%253D%26SERVER%3DWZ6myaEXBLF%252FdY29RpN4fA%253D%253D%26ORIGIN%3D158129490%26RD%3DRD&acw=&utt=
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know