Immunisation coverage in Australian Indigenous children: Time to move the goal posts
Vaccine, ISSN: 0264-410X, Vol: 27, Issue: 2, Page: 307-312
2009
- 26Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- CrossRef21
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures26
- Readers26
- 26
Article Description
Childhood immunisation coverage reported at 12 to <15 months and 2 years of age, may mask deficiencies in the timeliness of vaccines designed to protect against diseases in infancy. This study aimed to evaluate immunisation timeliness in Indigenous infants in the Northern Territory, Australia. Coverage was analysed at the date children turned 7, 13 and 18 months of age. By 7 months of age, 45.2% of children had completed the recommended schedule, increasing to 49.5% and 81.2% at 13 and 18 months of age, respectively. Immunisation performance benchmarks must focus on improving the timeliness in these children in the first year of life.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X08013637; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.096; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=57149097840&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18977263; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264410X08013637; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.096
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know