Predictors of willingness to receive updated 2023–2024 COVID-19 booster vaccines among a convenience sample in Minnesota
Vaccine, ISSN: 0264-410X, Vol: 42, Issue: 15, Page: 3499-3504
2024
- 3Citations
- 13Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Article Description
To determine factors associated with intention to receive recommended COVID-19 booster vaccines in 2023–2024. A cross-sectional study of 1,256 individuals at Minnesota State and County fairs was conducted to assess their intention to receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine in the coming year if recommended. The association between booster intention and multiple factors believed to influence willingness to receive the vaccine, including perceived vaccine safety, perceived risk of COVID-19, public health knowledge, fear of future pandemics, and political affiliation, were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression and adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Intention to receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine was high among our participants with 56% reporting they were extremely likely to receive the vaccine this year and another 15% reporting that they were likely to do the same. A strong association with getting a booster vaccine was found between perceived vaccine safety (aOR: 15.3, 95% CI: 10.6–22.2), perceived COVID-19 risk (aOR: 3.5, 95% CI: 2.4–5.1), pandemic fear (aOR: 3.4, 95% CI: 2.4–4.8), public health knowledge (aOR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.9–1.8), and democrat political affiliation (aOR: 2.8, 95%CI: 1.8–4.4). Our study emphasizes the importance of perceived vaccine safety as a predictor of intention to accept COVID-19 vaccines and highlights the continued need to effectively communicate with the public about the safety of vaccines.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24004808; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.053; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85190788217&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38641495; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264410X24004808; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.053
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know