Trends and factors associated with receipt of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in private, public, and alternative settings in the United States
Vaccine, ISSN: 0264-410X, Vol: 42, Issue: 22, Page: 126036
2024
- 1Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
One of the goals of the President’s Cancer Panel was to maximize access to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination through expansion of alternative settings for receiving the vaccine, such as in public health settings, schools, and pharmacies. In a cross-sectional analysis, we utilized the National Immunization Survey-Teen data from 2014 to 2020 ( n = 74,645) to describe trends and factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake in private, public, and alternative settings. We calculated annual percent change (APC) between 2014 and 2020, estimating rate of HPV vaccine uptake across settings. Using multinomial logistic regression, we estimated the odds of receipt of HPV vaccine in public health settings and other alternative settings compared to private healthcare settings, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. We found a 5 % annual increase in the use of private facilities between 2014–2018 (APC = 5.3; 95 % CI 3.4, 7.1), and almost 7 % between 2018–2020 (APC = 6.7; 95 % CI 1.4, 12.3). Adjusted multinomial logistic regression analyses found that odds of receiving vaccinations at a public facility vs. a private facility increased almost two times for adolescents living below poverty (aOR = 1.82, 95 % CI: 1.60, 2.08) compared to above poverty. Additionally, adolescents without physician recommendations had lower odds of receiving vaccines at public versus private facilities (aOR = 1.75, 95 % CI: 1.44, 2.12). Finally, odds of receiving HPV vaccines at public facilities vs. private facilities decreased by 33 % for White adolescents (aOR = 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.57, 0.78) versus Black adolescents. Sociodemographic factors such as race, and socioeconomic factors such as poverty level, and receipt of physician HPV recommendations are associated with receiving the vaccine at private settings vs. public health facilities and alternative settings. This information is important in strengthening alternative settings for HPV vaccine uptake to increase access to the vaccine among disadvantaged individuals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24006637; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.06.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85196044265&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38876838; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264410X24006637; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.06.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know