Reliable differentiation of a non-toxigenic tox gene-bearing Corynebacterium ulcerans variant frequently isolated from game animals using MALDI-TOF MS
Veterinary Microbiology, ISSN: 0378-1135, Vol: 237, Page: 108399
2019
- 22Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef20
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Corynebacterium ( C. ) ulcerans is a zoonotic member of the C. diphtheriae group and is known to cause abscesses in humans and several animal species. Toxigenic strains, expressing the tox gene encoding diphtheria toxin, are also able to cause diphtheria in humans. In recent years, a n on- t oxigenic but tox gene- b earing (NTTB) variant of C. ulcerans has been identified that was frequently isolated from clinically healthy as well as from diseased wildlife animals, especially wild boars ( Sus scrofa scrofa ) in Germany and Austria. The described clinical cases showed similar signs of disease and the isolated corynebacteria displayed common genetic features as well as similar spectroscopic characteristics, therefore being assigned to a so called wild boar cluster (WBC). This study describes the establishment and validation of a method using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for a reliable differentiation between various members of the C. diphtheriae group at species level as well as a reliable sub-level identification of C. ulcerans isolates of the WBC variant. For this study 93 C. ulcerans isolates from wildlife animals, 41 C. ulcerans isolates from other animals and humans, and 53 isolates from further representatives of the C. diphtheriae group, as well as 26 non- diphtheriae group Corynebacteria collected via the MALDI user platform from seven MALDI users were used. By assigning 86 C. ulcerans isolates to the WBC the extensive geographical distribution of this previously less noticed variant in two Central European countries could be shown.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378113519306224; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108399; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071989973&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31585651; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378113519306224; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108399
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know