Impacts of hydraulic retention time and inflow water quality on algal growth in a shallow lake supplied with reclaimed water
Water Cycle, ISSN: 2666-4453, Vol: 3, Page: 71-78
2022
- 14Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Landscape lakes supplied with reclaimed water often face the threats of algal blooms. To guarantee the water quality in an artificial shallow lake (Lake M), algal growth and water quality changes were predicted by Delft3D. When the concentrations of influent total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorous (TP) were fixed at 10 mg N/L and 0.2 mg P/L, respectively, increases in the hydraulic retention time (HRT) which was induced by water depth increased algal growth. The average algal density in Lake M was 6.42 × 10 4 cells/mL when the HRT was 4 d, which increased to 2.14 × 10 5 cells/mL when the HRT was 8 d. These results showed that the shallowness of the lake contributed positively to algae control. The shallower water depth came with the shorter HRT while nutrient load and light intensity were increased subsequently, which usually favor algal growth but not the dominant factors of algal density in Lake M. When the influent TN concentration was between 2 and 15 mg N/L of which nitrate changed, the HRT was fixed at 8 d, and the influent TP concentration was 0.2 mg/L, the algal density was approximately 2 × 10 5 cells/mL. Algae were not sensitive to changes in the influent TN concentration, and TN should be considered as a secondary factor in algal growth. Increases in the TP concentration promoted algal growth because phosphorous is the dominant nutrient for algae to acquire from reclaimed water if there is sufficient nitrogen. When the HRT of the lake was 8 d and the influent TN concentration was 10 mg/L, the average algal density in the lake was on the order of 10 4 cells/mL as the TP concentration was 0.1 mg/L. Because the water depth determines the HRT, it should be carefully considered during design and construction of artificial lakes. Influent phosphorus should be monitored to control algal blooms during maintenance of artificial lakes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666445322000083; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watcyc.2022.04.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130359194&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666445322000083; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watcyc.2022.04.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know