Are we leaving women with disabilities in the Global South behind? How the reinforcement of different forms of violence leads to unsustainable development
Women's Studies International Forum, ISSN: 0277-5395, Vol: 109, Page: 103051
2025
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
This study explores the pervasive and multifaceted violence faced by women with disabilities in Nepal, focusing on the ways in which these experiences are shaped by intersecting social hierarchies, including those based on gender, caste, and socioeconomic status. Through 25 qualitative interviews conducted in the Kathmandu Valley, the research reveals the complex interplay between personal, structural, and cultural violence, drawing upon comprehensive violence theories and intersectional analysis. The findings indicate that these women are subjected to a range of forms of violence perpetrated by family members, community figures, and within institutional settings. Despite the advancement of Nepal's policy framework in alignment with international disability rights instruments and the United Nations' 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the study underscores the discrepancy between existing legal provisions and the lived realities of women with disabilities. Systemic barriers, stigmatisation and inadequate support structures serve to increase their exposure to and susceptibility to violence, adversely impacting their health, well-being and personal development. This research calls for more targeted and inclusive strategies that prioritise the perspectives and needs of disabled women to ensure the global commitment to “leave no one behind” is upheld.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524001894; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.103051; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85213946873&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0277539524001894; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.103051
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know