Insilico drug repurposing using FDA approved drugs against Membrane protein of SARS-CoV-2
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ISSN: 0022-3549, Vol: 110, Issue: 6, Page: 2346-2354
2021
- 12Citations
- 61Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef8
- Captures61
- Readers61
- 61
Article Description
The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak has started taking away the millions of lives worldwide. Identification of known and approved drugs against novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) seems to be an urgent need for the repurposing of the existing drugs. So, here we examined a safe strategy of using approved drugs of SuperDRUG2 database against modeled membrane protein (M-protein) of SARS-CoV-2 which is essential for virus assembly by using molecular docking-based virtual screening. A total of 3639 drugs from SuperDRUG2 database and additionally 14 potential drugs reported against COVID-19 proteins were selected. Molecular docking analyses revealed that nine drugs can bind the active site of M-protein with desirable molecular interactions. We therefore applied molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculation using MM-PBSA to analyze the stability of the compounds. The complexes of M-protein with the selected drugs were simulated for 50 ns and ranked according to their binding free energies. The binding mode of the drugs with M-protein was analyzed and it was observed that Colchicine, Remdesivir, Bafilomycin A1 from COVID-19 suggested drugs and Temozolomide from SuperDRUG2 database displayed desirable molecular interactions and higher binding affinity towards M-protein. Interestingly, Colchicine was found as the top most binder among tested drugs against M-protein. We therefore additionally identified four Colchicine derivatives which can bind efficiently with M-protein and have better pharmacokinetic properties. We recommend that these drugs can be tested further through in vitro studies against SARS-CoV-2 M-protein.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022354921001519; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2021.03.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102754864&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33684397; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022354921001519; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2021.03.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know