Exploiting plant transcriptomic databases: Resources, tools, and approaches
Plant Communications, ISSN: 2590-3462, Vol: 3, Issue: 4, Page: 100323
2022
- 19Citations
- 65Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef1
- Captures65
- Readers65
- 65
Review Description
There are now more than 300 000 RNA sequencing samples available, stemming from thousands of experiments capturing gene expression in organs, tissues, developmental stages, and experimental treatments for hundreds of plant species. The expression data have great value, as they can be re-analyzed by others to ask and answer questions that go beyond the aims of the study that generated the data. Because gene expression provides essential clues to where and when a gene is active, the data provide powerful tools for predicting gene function, and comparative analyses allow us to study plant evolution from a new perspective. This review describes how we can gain new knowledge from gene expression profiles, expression specificities, co-expression networks, differential gene expression, and experiment correlation. We also introduce and demonstrate databases that provide user-friendly access to these tools.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590346222000736; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100323; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129566821&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35605200; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590346222000736; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100323
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know