Validation of the Chinese version of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in adults with epilepsy
Epilepsy & Behavior, ISSN: 1525-5050, Vol: 89, Page: 148-152
2018
- 34Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations34
- Citation Indexes34
- 34
- CrossRef33
- Captures41
- Readers41
- 41
Article Description
This study aimed to validate the Chinese version of the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (C-HRSD-17) for use in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE). A consecutive sample of Chinese adult PWE from a tertiary hospital was examined using the C-HRSD-17 and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus Chinese Version 5.0.0. A total of 191 PWE completed the assessment of depression. According to the MINI, thirty patients (15.7%) had current major depressive disorder (MDD). The Cronbach's α coefficient for the C-HRSD-17 was 0.832. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.983 (95% CI = 0.968–0.998). With a cutoff score of 9, the C-HRSD-17 demonstrated the best psychometric properties, with a sensitivity of 96.7%, a specificity of 93.8%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 74.4%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.3%. The C-HRSD-17 proved to be a valid and reliable assessment tool, with a cutoff score of 9 for screening of current MDD in Chinese adult PWE.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505018306139; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.10.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056162958&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30415137; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1525505018306139; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.10.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know