Exon-capture data and locus screening provide new insights into the phylogeny of flatfishes (Pleuronectoidei)
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, ISSN: 1055-7903, Vol: 166, Page: 107315
2022
- 8Citations
- 16Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef3
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
- Mentions2
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Most Recent Blog
[Ichthyology • 2022] Exon-capture Data and Locus Screening provide new insights into the Phylogeny of Flatfishes (Pleuronectoidei)
in Atta, Yuan, Li, ... et Tornabene, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107315 Highlights: • Phylogenetic analysis of flatfishes uses next-gen dataset with largest taxon sampling to date. •
Article Description
There is an extensive collection of literature on the taxonomy and phylogenetics of flatfishes (Pleuronectiformes) that extends over two centuries, but consensus on many of their evolutionary relationships remains elusive. Phylogenetic uncertainty stems from highly divergent results derived from morphological and genetic characters, and between various molecular datasets. Deciphering relationships is complicated by rapid diversification early in the Pleuronectiformes tree and an abundance of studies that incompletely and inconsistently sample taxa and genetic markers. We present phylogenies based on a genome-wide dataset (4,434 nuclear markers via exon-capture) and wide taxon sampling (86 species spanning 12 of 16 families) of the largest flatfish suborder (Pleuronectoidei). Nine different subsets of the data and two tree construction approaches (eighteen phylogenies in total) are remarkably consistent with other recent molecular phylogenies, and show strong support for the monophyly of all families included except Pleuronectidae. Analyses resolved a novel phylogenetic hypothesis for the family Rhombosoleidae as being within the Pleuronectoidea rather than the Soleoidea, and failed to support the subfamily Hippoglossinae as a monophyletic group. Our results were corroborated with evidence from previous phylogenetic studies to outline regions of persistent phylogenetic uncertainty and identify groups in need of further phylogenetic inference.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790321002487; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107315; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85115655160&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537325; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1055790321002487; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107315
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know