The role and utility of population-based cancer registries in cervical cancer surveillance and control
Preventive Medicine, ISSN: 0091-7435, Vol: 144, Page: 106237
2021
- 32Citations
- 84Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations32
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef1
- Policy Citations10
- Policy Citation10
- Captures84
- Readers84
- 84
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
The role and utility of population-based cancer registries in cervical cancer surveillance and control
A new publication by scientists from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), in collaboration with researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) and the National Cancer Institute (USA), presents an overview of the critical role of population-based cancer registries in cervical cancer control. This article is part of a Special Issue of the journal Preventive
Article Description
Population–based cancer registries (PBCR) are vital to the assessment of the cancer burden and in monitoring and evaluating national progress in cervical cancer surveillance and control. Yet the level of their development in countries exhibiting the highest cervical cancer incidence rates is suboptimal, and requires considerable investment if they are to document the impact of WHO global initiative to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem. As a starting point we propose a comprehensive cancer surveillance framework, positioning PBCR in relation to other health information systems that are required across the cancer control continuum. The key concepts of PBCR are revisited and their role in providing a situation analysis of the scale and profile of the cancer-specific incidence and survival, and their evolution over time is illustrated with specific examples. Linking cervical cancer data to screening and immunization information systems enables the development of a comprehensive set of measures capable of assessing the short- and long-term achievements and impact of the initiative. Such data form the basis of national and global estimates of the cancer burden and permit comparisons across countries, facilitating decision-making or triggering cancer control action. The initiation and sustainable development of PBCR must be an early step in the scale-up of cervical cancer control activities as a means to ensure progress is successfully monitored and appraised.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743520302619; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106237; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102697253&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33678223; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091743520302619; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106237
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know