Increasing confidence in waiving dermal toxicity studies: A comparison of oral and dermal acute data with alternative approaches for agrochemicals and products
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, ISSN: 0273-2300, Vol: 121, Page: 104865
2021
- 4Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef1
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
The refinement of OECD 402 study design and criteria under which the study can be waived has been welcomed in some regulatory regions but met with uncertainty in others. To address these human safety concerns, previously available in vivo acute oral and acute dermal toxicity data was evaluated from a total of 597 agrochemical active ingredients and products. It was identified that all active ingredients and 99.6% of products had an acute dermal classification equal to or less toxic than their acute oral classification, confirming that waiving the acute dermal study and basing the outcome on the acute oral toxicity result has no impact on human health assessment. Additionally, automated Acute Toxicity Estimate (ATE) calculations were conducted on 440 products to evaluate if the predicted dermal toxicity resulted in the same in vivo classification. 93% of ATE predictions provided excellent correlation to the in vivo result and 6.4% resulted in a more conservative prediction. It is therefore clear that the results of this investigation, should remove any regulatory concerns and that OECD 402 can be confidently eliminated in its entirety from testing requirements globally.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230021000052; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104865; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099628226&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33453310; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0273230021000052; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104865
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know