The significance of pelvic fin flexibility for tree climbing fish
Zoology, ISSN: 0944-2006, Vol: 119, Issue: 6, Page: 511-517
2016
- 20Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef11
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
In this article, we compare the characteristics of biomechanical attachment exhibited by two morphologically different mudskipper species, Boleophthalmus boddarti (with fused pelvic fins) and Periophthalmus variabilis (with unfused pelvic fins). P. variabilis is a tree and rock climber while B. boddarti dwells in the muddy shallows and is unable to climb. Our aim in this article is to determine whether it is predominantly chemical or morphological properties of the pelvic fins from each species that may allow P. variabilis to climb trees whilst preventing B. boddarti from doing the same. To fulfil our objective we perform friction and suction resistance tests, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of the mucosal secretions under the fins, direct geometrical measurements and finite element modelling. We find that B. boddarti has considerable resistance to pull-off forces, while P. variabilis has greater frictional resistance. Both species produce mucopolysaccaharides that we suggest aid Stefan adhesion to different substrates. P. variabilis fins are, nevertheless, considerably more flexible than those of B. boddarti and we conclude that P. variabilis is consequently able to maintain a more intimate surface area of contact with underlying material, which aids Stefan adhesion, increases frictional resistance, and helps it to climb trees.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944200616300575; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2016.06.007; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84995693611&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27421678; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0944200616300575; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2016.06.007
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know