Treatment of recalcitrant recurrent corneal erosions with inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase-9, doxycycline and corticosteroids
American Journal of Ophthalmology, ISSN: 0002-9394, Vol: 132, Issue: 1, Page: 8-13
2001
- 185Citations
- 93Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations185
- Citation Indexes184
- 184
- CrossRef161
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures93
- Readers93
- 93
- Mentions4
- References4
- 4
Article Description
PURPOSE: To review the efficacy of inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase-9, corticosteroids, and doxycycline for treatment of recalcitrant recurrent corneal erosion. METHODS: Retrospective, clinic-based, interventional case series. The medical records of seven consecutive patients who were treated between January 1995 to January 2000 for recurrent corneal erosion who had not responded to conventional therapy were reviewed. Treatment of seven eyes of seven patients consisted of oral doxycycline (50 mg, two times a day) for 2 months along with a topical corticosteroid (either methylprednisolone 1%, prednisolone acetate 1%, or fluoromethalone 0.1%) three times a day, for 2 to 3 weeks. The effects of doxycycline and methylprednisolone on metalloproteinase-9 activity in human corneal epithelial cultures were evaluated by gelatin zymography and a commercial metalloproteinase-9 activity assay kit. RESULT: Fingernail injury in three of the seven eyes was the most common form of corneal injury. There was no evidence of epithelial basement membrane or corneal stromal dystrophy in any of the patients, although epithelial microcysts were observed in the involved area in three patients. One eye had intact elevated corneal epithelium that showed abnormal diffuse staining with fluorescein dye, and six eyes had a corneal epithelial defect at the time of presentation. In all seven eyes, pain resolved and epithelial defects healed within 2 to 10 days after initiation of therapy. No recurrence was observed during an average follow-up period of 21.9 months (range, 1.5 to 60 months). Methylprednisolone and doxycycline each produced a statistically significant decrease in amount and activity of metalloproteinase-9 in conditioned media of human corneal epithelial cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with a combination of medications that inhibit metalloproteinase-9 produced rapid resolution and prevented further recurrence of cases of recurrent corneal erosions that were unresponsive to conventional therapies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939401009138; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00913-8; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034955432&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11438047; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002939401009138; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0002939401009138?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0002939401009138?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002939401009138; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394%2801%2900913-8; http://www.ajo.com/article/S0002-9394(01)00913-8/abstract; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/getSharedSiteSession?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ajo.com%2Farticle%2FS0002-9394%2801%2900913-8%2Fabstract&rc=0&code=ajopht-site; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.ajo.com%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaa-2v5FdT9kc7IARlKxv%2526MAID%253Dndcm7yCQfdCuoIcAtieLwQ%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLEt1UgI9cIkvA%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D441698253%2526RD%253DRD; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore/?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.ajo.com%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaa-2v5FdT9kc7IARlKxv%2526MAID%253Dndcm7yCQfdCuoIcAtieLwQ%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLEt1UgI9cIkvA%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D441698253%2526RD%253DRD; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/consumeSsoCookie?redirectUri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ajo.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSharedSessionAction%3FJSESSIONID%3Daaa-2v5FdT9kc7IARlKxv%26MAID%3Dndcm7yCQfdCuoIcAtieLwQ%253D%253D%26SERVER%3DWZ6myaEXBLEt1UgI9cIkvA%253D%253D%26ORIGIN%3D441698253%26RD%3DRD&acw=&utt=
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know