The monolayer technique: a potent tool for studying the interfacial properties of antimicrobial and membrane-lytic peptides and their interactions with lipid membranes
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, ISSN: 0005-2736, Vol: 1462, Issue: 1, Page: 109-140
1999
- 541Citations
- 359Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations541
- Citation Indexes541
- 541
- CrossRef406
- Captures359
- Readers359
- 358
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Review Description
Erudites of the antiquity already knew the calming effect of oil films on the sea waves. But one had to wait until 1774 to read the first scientific report on oil films from B. Franklin and again 1878 to learn the thermodynamic analysis on adsorption developed by J. Gibbs. Then, in 1891, Agnes Pockels described a technique to manipulate oil films by using barriers. Finally, in 1917, I. Langmuir introduced the experimental and theoretical modern concepts on insoluble monolayers. Since that time, and because it has been found to provide invaluable information at the molecular scale, the monolayer technique has been more and more extensively used, and, during the past decade, an explosive increase in the number of publications has occurred. Over the same period, considerable and ever-increasing interest in the antimicrobial peptides of various plants, bacteria, insects, amphibians and mammals has grown. Because many of these antimicrobial peptides act at the cell membrane level, the monolayer technique is entirely suitable for studying their physicochemical and biological properties. This review describes monolayer experiments performed with some of these antimicrobial peptides, especially gramicidin A, melittin, cardiotoxins and defensin A. After giving a few basic notions of surface chemistry, the surface-active properties of these peptides and their behavior when they are arranged in monomolecular films are reported and discussed in relation to their tridimensional structure and their amphipathic character. The penetration of these antimicrobial peptides into phospholipid monolayer model membranes, as well as their interactions with lipids in mixed films, are also emphasized.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005273699002035; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0005-2736(99)00203-5; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032694324&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10590305; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0005273699002035; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0005273699002035; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0005273699002035?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0005273699002035?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0005-2736%2899%2900203-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0005-2736%2899%2900203-5
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know