Ultrasonographic endometrial changes after intrauterine insemination: a comparison of two catheters
Fertility and Sterility, ISSN: 0015-0282, Vol: 68, Issue: 4, Page: 731-734
1997
- 29Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations29
- Citation Indexes29
- 29
- CrossRef26
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Objective : To determine and compare the transvaginal ultrasonographic (US) endometrial changes immediately after IUI using the Edwards Wallace (H.G. Wallace, Limited, Colchester, Essex, UK) and Tom-Cat (Sherwood Medical, St. Louis, MO) catheters. Design : Prospective study. Setting : IVF unit. Patient(s) and Intervention(s) : Eighty-two infertile patients underwent 112 cycles of ovulation induction with IUI. Either the Edwards Wallace catheter (group 1, n = 32) or the TomCat catheter (group 2, n = 80) was used for sperm insemination. The presence of an endometrial three-layer pattern before IUI was a prerequisite for inclusion in the study. After each IUI, the endometrium was reassessed by transvaginal US. Main Outcome Measure(s) : Ultrasonographic endometrial changes, clinical pregnancy rates (PRs), complications, and patients' complaints were compared between the two groups. Result(s) : Total destruction of the endometrial three-layer pattern was observed in 12.5% of the cycles in group 1, compared with 50% of the cycles in group 2. Clinical pregnancies occurred in 14 (12.5%) of the 112 IUI cycles. A higher PR was achieved when the endometrial three-layer pattern was preserved after IUI. The patients in group 2 had more complaints of bleeding and pain during the procedure. Conclusion(s) : Ultrasonographic changes after IUI suggest that the Edwards Wallace catheter is significantly less traumatic to the endometrium than the Tom-Cat catheter. Although both catheters yielded the same overall PR, there was a trend indicating that sparing the endometrial three-layer pattern from damage increases the chance of conception.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028297002811; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00281-1; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0030712467&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9341621; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028297002811; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028297002811; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0015028297002811?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0015028297002811?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282%2897%2900281-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282%2897%2900281-1
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know