In vivo forces used to develop design parameters for tissue engineered implants for rabbit patellar tendon repair
Journal of Biomechanics, ISSN: 0021-9290, Vol: 36, Issue: 4, Page: 483-488
2003
- 78Citations
- 79Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations78
- Citation Indexes78
- 78
- CrossRef66
- Captures79
- Readers79
- 79
Article Description
Previous studies in tissue engineering have shown that suspending undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells in collagen gels and wrapping them about a suture causes alignment of cells and contraction of constructs in culture in a form that is suitable for implantation for tendon repair. Little is known about the patterns of these in vivo signals that might improve tendon repair biomechanics. Three hypotheses were tested in this study using the rabbit patellar tendon (PT) model: (1) peak in vivo forces and the rates of rise and fall in these forces will increase significantly with increasing levels of activity; (2) the PTs safety factor for all activities will be in the range of values found for tendons (2.5–3); (3) rabbits will not “favor” the operated limb at the time of evaluation but maintain similar vertical ground reaction forces in both limbs during quiet standing (QS). In vivo rabbit PT forces were measured during QS and while the animal hopped on a treadmill whose speed (0.04 and 0.13 m/s) and inclination (0° and 12°) were controlled. Implantable force transducers were surgically placed in one PT and data collected three days post surgery in each of eight New Zealand White rabbits. Peak tensile forces increased significantly with inclination of the treadmill and the rates of rise and fall in tendon force increased significantly with both speed and inclination ( p <0.001). Such design criteria should be useful in mechanically stimulating cell-gel constructs for tendon repair.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929002004591; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00459-1; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0037397187&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12600338; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021929002004591; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021929002004591; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0021929002004591?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0021929002004591?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290%2802%2900459-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290%2802%2900459-1
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know