Papillary Urothelial Neoplasm of Low Malignant Potential: Evolving Terminology and Concepts
The Journal of Urology, ISSN: 0022-5347, Vol: 175, Issue: 6, Page: 1995-2003
2006
- 85Citations
- 15Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations85
- Citation Indexes85
- 85
- CrossRef72
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Review Description
The most controversial aspect of the new WHO 2004/ISUP classification system is the creation of the PUNLMP diagnostic category. We discuss PUNLMP tumors and the WHO 2004/ISUP classification system with an emphasis on tumor morphology and heterogeneity, recurrence and progression rates, tumor genetics, interobserver variability and the usefulness of biomarkers and molecular diagnostic techniques for grading bladder tumors.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534706002679; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(06)00267-9; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33646378397&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16697785; http://www.jurology.com/doi/10.1016/S0022-5347%2806%2900267-9; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022534706002679; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0022534706002679?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0022534706002679?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347%2806%2900267-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347%2806%2900267-9; https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1016/S0022-5347%2806%2900267-9; http://www.jurology.com/article/S0022-5347(06)00267-9/abstract; http://www.jurology.com/article/S0022534706002679/abstract; http://www.jurology.com/article/S0022534706002679/fulltext; http://www.jurology.com/article/S0022534706002679/pdf
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know